Megatron81 179 Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 I didn't think West Michigan would move up a spot thought would stay or drop in their DMA number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCB4TV 331 Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 Tulsa down from #58 to #62, while OKC stays put at #41. Food for Thought: This means that KJRH is eligible to join Gray should Scripps decide to sell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColumbusNewsFan 217 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 I'm calling it now, Columbus stays at #32 And Cincinnati and Cleveland drops at least 1 spot each. So Cincinnati drops 1, Correct Columbus drops 2 spots to #34, Wow! Toledo is growing TV wise gone from #87 to #78 in the span of a decade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCB4TV 331 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 With Seattle now at 12, I now wonder whether this now makes FOX more anxious to possibly acquire KCPQ/KZJO from Tribune with the Sinclair issue continuing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzard59 41 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I like that they included the population of people 12+ in each DMA this year. That allows for numerous additional calculations in Excel. Such as, nationwide, there are 2.45 people 12+ per TV household, but this figure ranges from 3.19 in Laredo to 1.15 in Juneau. The Grand Junction and San Angelo markets are the closest to the national average. Of the top 20 Markets, Los Angeles and the Bay Area have the biggest TV households (2.95 and 2.65 P12+/HH, respectively), while Tampa-St. Petersburg and Cleveland have the smallest (both 2.27 P12+/HH). If Los Angeles had a TV household size comparable to Pittsburgh's 2.16 P12+/HH, Los Angeles would overtake New York as top DMA when ranked by TV households. If DMAs were ranked by population 12+ instead of TV households, Monterey-Salinas would make the biggest move up the list, rising 21 places to go to #104. Fargo and Wausau-Rhinelander would drop the most by moving down 9 spots to land at #122 and #143, respectively. Only a quarter (53) of the DMAs have the exact same position whether ranked by population 12+ or TV households. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColDayNews 437 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 So Cincinnati drops 1, Correct Columbus drops 2 spots to #34, Wow! Toledo is growing TV wise gone from #87 to #78 in the span of a decade. Our population in Cbus continues to grow, yet people aren't watching TV. Do you think we'll get to #30 in 2018? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megatron81 179 Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 With Seattle now at 12, I now wonder whether this now makes FOX more anxious to possibly acquire KCPQ/KZJO from Tribune with the Sinclair issue continuing. Fox has wanted to be in Seattle for a while they almost did if Tribune & Fox couldn't come to an agreement a couple of years ago I think Fox bought a low power station that would have been a Fox O&O for Seattle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
channel2 869 Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 Yeah they went behind everyone's backs and tried to buy a station with a rimshot signal in Bellingham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColumbusNewsFan 217 Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 Our population in Cbus continues to grow, yet people aren't watching TV. Do you think we'll get to #30 in 2018? No, because of one word, Streaming. I personally watch more YouTube then normal regular TV these. We're growing and young which means That population that stick with Streaming is growing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PelicanGuy 117 Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 Looks like New Orleans and Memphis will be flip-flopping spots from here on out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
almostlive 4 Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 No, because of one word, Streaming. I personally watch more YouTube then normal regular TV these. We're growing and young which means That population that stick with Streaming is growing. Streaming vs traditional viewing has nothing to do with it. DMA rank is determined solely by household figures in counties assigned to each DMA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrad 113 Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 Streaming vs traditional viewing has nothing to do with it. DMA rank is determined solely by household figures in counties assigned to each DMA. I think they are meaning households with TVs watching traditionally. Maybe some households have cut cords entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.