Jump to content

Media General Stations pulled from Dish


broadcastfan9751

Recommended Posts

Broadcasting & Cable is reporting that Media General has pulled 18 of its stations from Dish after negotiations for a new retransmission consent contract fell through. Dish claims that it has attempted to reach a new agreement, but that Media General has remained immovable in it's demands. Dish also apparently proposed a short-term extension of the previous contract until their merger with Young Broadcasting is completed. It is also calling for reform of the retransmission consent process. It is the first retransmission blackout in Media General's history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Broadcasting & Cable is reporting that Media General has pulled 18 of it's stations from Dish after negotiations for a new retransmission consent contract fell through. Dish claims that it has attempted to reach a new agreement, but that Media General has remained immovable in it's demands. Dish also apparently proposed a short-term extension of the previous contract until their merger with Young Broadcasting is completed. It is also calling for reform of the retransmission consent process. It is the first retransmission blackout in Media General's history.

 

Dish is starting to be as bad as Time Warner Cable is with this stuff.

 

I can't figure out why Dish keeps getting themselves into this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Interesting how Google picks things up from the World Now sites. WCMH GM Dan Bradley gives his "Don't Drop WCMH" speech ... courtesy of the WFLA website.

 

http://www.wfla.com/story/22611323/dont-drop-wcmh

 

By changing the domain, I can turn it into a WVTM story:

 

http://www.alabamas13.com/story/22611323/dont-drop-wcmh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Dish is starting to be as bad as Time Warner Cable is with this stuff.

 

I can't figure out why Dish keeps getting themselves into this situation.

 

As someone with an interest in keeping my cable bill as low as possible, it's hard for me not to admire Time Warner for playing hardball. Everybody wants a piece of the cable money pool so its hard for me to fault them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dish is especially bad at these retrans standoffs. Their track record is horrible when compared to DirecTV and other cable companies. Being that this is the first time Media General has ever had a standoff with any pay tv provider...Dish is taking the low road parading around town telling you about how "CBS 5" and "ABC 6" (whatever your local MG station is) are taking away your right to watch them on Dish. When you add up the other companies they have had issues with... (Lin, Raycom, Hoak, etc....) you start to see where the problem really lies....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hoak one is still ongoing, I think.

 

The Hopper and Ergen, plus the retrans environment of today, do not help.

 

But even before the Hopper they had disputes. They had a long one with Fisher, I recall, and an unusually protracted one with a single station—WBRZ Baton Rouge. I think that one lasted at least a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In a related story, Dish has submitted an objection Media General's merger with Young Broadcasting, saying that Media General is attempting to extend its retransmission consent terms to the Young stations when the deal is completed, which it says could be a violation of FCC rules.

 

For the most part this is standard operating procedure. A WSJ article also pointed this out back in July stating "big station groups can apply the fee terms they’ve negotiated to smaller stations they buy, providing an immediate uplift in fee revenue." For example, let's say MG was able to negotiate 50 cents per station and Young only 25 cents per station. If this was a straight up acquisition of Young by MG the MG rates would then apply to the Young stations upon closing. Without knowing all the details I think the issue here is that it's a merger and not an acquisition. It looks like MG is trying to cover their bases and extend terms that wouldn't normally apply with a merger.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using TVNewsTalk you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.