Jump to content

Welcome, Guest!

Sign In or Create my Account to gain full access to our forums. By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

oklahomanewsman

Member
  • Content Count

    554
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

oklahomanewsman last won the day on May 24 2017

oklahomanewsman had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

210 Excellent

About oklahomanewsman

  • Rank
    News Director
  • Birthday 12/22/1998

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I think WSFL could be a MyNetworkTV O&O meaning that at some point Fox could acquire WSVN. But at the same time, if they're willing to build an in house news department for WSFL and turn it into a Fox O&O, then I could see them being a sucess. I'm not sure how successful it might be but it'll be intresting to see what Fox does with WSFL and what happens to WSVN and WBFS as well
  2. Fox's racing graphics has gotten horrible by each update, I don't know who does the racing graphics but someone needs to be fired because the way it looks now is horrible (worse than the 2014-17 graphics)
  3. I don't see CBS-Viacom happening but based off of what transpired with Disney-Fox anything is possible at this point
  4. Here's my classic WFAA intros from BOTH the 80s and 90s (with the voiceovers in it because I love to do the voiceovers) 1984: This is the News 8 Update. With David Margulies, Midge Hill, Jim Littleton with Weather and Tony Martinez on Sports 1987: . It's 5:00 and this is WFAA-TV, Channel 8. Working in the Spirit of Texas, this is News 8. With John Criswell, Phyllis Watson, Troy Dungan with Weather and Dale Hansen on Sports. It's 10:00 and this is WFAA-TV, Channel 8. Working in the Spirit of Texas, this is News 8. With Tracy Rowlett, John Criswell, Troy Dungan with Weather and Dale Hansen on Sports If you notice, the graphics are the same, the intro is the same but there are noticible differences, oine is the the 84 intro was using the 1984-87 version of TM's Spirit whel the '87 intros used the 1987-92 version of TM's Spirit Also the '84 version had the vocals in it (hence "The Spirit of Texas on 8") while the '87 version has John B. Wells say "It's 10:00 and this is WFAA-TV, Channel 8. Working in the Spirit of Texas, this is News 8." A lot of people though doesn't realize though that for awhile WFAA did in fact had a 4:30 newscast it was known as "News 8 First News" was anchored by the same people who did the 5pm newscast at the time (Phyllis Watson, John Criswell, Troy Dungan with the Weather and Dale Hansen's Sports) I do have that intro on my YouTube channel Also if y'all have any idea of what year that intro was aired in let me know please and thank you.
  5. I could see a divestiture of ABC Studios (I doubt if Disney divests Marvel, LucasFilm or 20th Century Fox) and a stipulation that ESPN cannot pull the RSNs from satellite or telco providers
  6. Still I just can't justify a sell/spin off of ESPN now that not only Disney has bought BAMTech and it's now buying Fox's RSNs but also investing in the direct to consumer streaming service (ESPN Plus), just my opinion
  7. If Disney knew that ESPN was sinking and had a full ownership stake in the network then yeah ESPN would've been spun off but who owns the so called "silent majority" of ESPN? You guessed it, Hearst and Hearst doesn't want to give up their stake in ESPN because if they did that then stations like KMBC, WISN, WTAE and WBAL would've lost their right to simulcast NFL games involving their local team with ESPN. You have to understand that Disney would not have bought BAMTech or even considered buying Fox's Regional Sports Networks if they truly believed that ESPN was a sinking ship to the point of no return
  8. I'll say this, I don't think nor do I expect Disney to dump ESPN because they would not have acquired BAMTech or Fox's Regional Sports Networks if Disney got rid of ESPN, on top of that it would take Hearst to sell their stake in ESPN in order for Disney to spin the network off and that ain't happening either. It would be nice for Sinclair or someone else to buy ESPN but chances of that happening are slim to none
  9. http://deadline.com/2017/12/fox-assets-that-would-go-to-disney-worth-67-billion-led-by-regional-sports-networks-1202221158/ The pricetag for Disney's acquisition of 21st Century Fox with film/television production, cable channels (like NatGeo and FX Nets) and Fox's RSNs is $67.9 Billion Dollars with $22.4 Billion of it's enterprise value coming from the RSNs, followed by Film/TV production assets coming in at $13.3 billion and the cable channels coming in at $8.7 billion. It's expected that the deal could be announced in a matter of days according to Deadline despite Fox executives "remaining coy" about prospects of that merger
  10. This could be HUGE when it comes to Sports Rights moving forward, not only that but it could be a huge boost for the upcoming ESPN OTT service launched next year
  11. I still think that the ownership cap serves in the piublic interest (therefore we shouldn't eliminate the cap) BUT we should modify the ownership cap from 39% to 40% Now, my question becomes does the FCC even have the authority to modify or eliminate the national ownership cap? If so, where in the document does it say that the FCC, not Congress, has the authority to modify or eliminate the cap?
  12. Since how it will be an open to the public on the FCC's website for comments, I'd be curious as to what the public would have to say about rasing the cap (we all know what Free Press and other advocacy groups will say to the FCC about this)
  13. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-12/u-s-is-said-to-suggest-ways-at-t-could-win-time-warner-approval Now Antitrust officials are suggesting a sale of CNN, TNT, TBS, TruTV, etc. to another company then forming a joint venture with that company but they have not discussed scenarios where they either sell Turner or DirecTV. President Trump has indicated that the Justice Department will sue to block the merger saying “it will probably end up being maybe litigation.” Another thing to note is should a case proceed it could take several months to reach a decision, after which either side could appeal, further delaying a decision about the proposed deal, which is already more than a year in the works.
  14. Which means AT&T would have to shed Turner Broadcasting because you can't seperate CNN from the Turner networks
  15. The Murdochs would have to be foolished enough to sell everything but Fox broadcasting itself. If anything, Disney would be better off shedding some of their properties that's hurting Disney's bottom line than to acquire a company
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using TVNewsTalk you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.