Jump to content

Welcome, Guest!

Sign In or Create my Account to gain full access to our forums. By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

dalekusa

Member
  • Content Count

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

1 Follower

About dalekusa

  • Rank
    Assignment Editor

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Going back to an earlier question, why wouldn't Deerfield want to give AT&T a fair deal if they can't tie it into Sinclair, and knowing if they did, they might just drag them into another RKO General situation?
  2. Couldn't they sue Sinclair as well, and potentially challenge Sinclair's whole shell company stratagem as well?
  3. Two more questions, then: Why wouldn't Deerfield want to negotiate a fair deal? Are they trying to tie their deal to Sinclair's? If not, it seems very counter-intuitive as they would be losing money out of this whole ordeal. Is there any way to take "bad faith" negotiations to court, or at least to an arbiter of some sort? I would imagine that if this was true, then, say, the Pac-12 conference could complain against or sue AT&T for not carrying their networks.
  4. Sorry to seem like a noob, but what exactly qualifies as "bad faith negotiations"?
  5. A wee bit surprising to me. With WGN's sports content going exclusive to cable (either on NBC Sports Chicago or Marquee), you'd think that they'd try and get that affiliation back, but I guess the Nexstar merger might have complicated things a bit?
  6. Or better yet, use CBS Local as a nod to the PNP days.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using TVNewsTalk you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.